Bear Lawyer Launches a Collateral Attack


4 responses to “#266

  1. Opposing attorney OBVIOUSLY had no cuppycakes. 😦

    • Which is perhaps for the best. As it stands, Bear Lawyer was merely being a bit overzealous in the fulfillment of his legal duty. Add the potential for ill-gotten frosted delights to the mix, and there’s not telling what would have happened.

  2. If that’s the collateral attack, I’d hate to be on the receiving end of one of BL’s directs!

    • It’s a marginally less musky and quite a bit less fuzzy—opposing counsel and his or her client(s) have the benefit of an aisle between them—though the results are similarly brutal.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s